Folks, you need to read more widely. Breitbart publishes a lot of stuff where as you go digging down to find the ultimate sources they quoted, there's nothing there. Just made-up opinion pieces based on a single person's opinion. Try to find others' writeups of some issue that appears in Breitbart them make up your own mind about which better represents what really happened. Look at local newspapers where something was claimed to have happened, not some national-publication summary.
Out here in reality - there are many independent officials in the various states who have certified their own election results and the Biden margin is so great that there is no way that all those separate officials - the majority of them Republican - could have secretly conspired together to throw the election.
This Texas petition to the Supreme Court is simply grandstanding, it has no chance of affecting the election. Only very limited issues between states can be heard in the Supreme court, only where something such as the boundary line between the states needs an impartial resolution. This Texas case asks that Texas overturn the results attained in several other states but there is no basis in the law or the Constitution for one state to invalidate another state's elections.
The Trump team declares election fraud outside court, then in court that word has never been asserted. In one case Giuliani was specifically asked if he would claim fraud and he backed down, said no. He clearly didn't want to risk his law license telling the lies in court that he was promoting outside court at the same time. No fraud has been proven in any court.
All of the cases are based on the concept that some irregularity in election processes was so severe that the state's electors should be ignored and the intention of that state should be decided by congress instead of by the state's voters. 50-some cases based on that argument have been rejected by the courts, often by Trump-appointed judges, declaring there is no basis in law to ignore a state's voters.
There was a single win, to suppress counting some ballots. A state extended the time allowed to correct trivial errors, no return address on the mail-in ballot etc, and only the first-time voters in a couple of counties were overlooked in advising of of this extension. No election fraud, just administrative screw-up. The ballots with those flaws, fewer than a thousand, were set aside and never counted. Giuliani team's single win was to suppress ever counting those flawed ballots. Big Win! Throw out the state's election results! Actually no, the Biden margin was far larger than that small number of overlooked first-time voters. No allegation of a fraudulent voter was ever claimed, it was just a messy bureaucratic screw-up. The other 57 court cases were even more trivial so each court, separately, ruled there was no need for a remedy. This isn't conspiracy, it is judges of various diverse backgrounds all interpreting the Constitution the same.
This Supreme Court has a majority of Trumpers but they will rule that there is nothing in the Constituton that allows Texas to invalidate the elections of several other states.
www.breitbart.com
www.thegatewaypundit.com
rumble.com
www.politifact.com