</p>
I have needed some lift on mine for a long time now, and it didn't take me but a few minutes with a floor jack to see that by merely increasing the ride height with the existing A-arms and shock tower that a serious camber problem would arise. Which is exactly what Two-guns is making mention of. Go place a jack under the differential skidplate on any of them and increase the height by 2 inches and see that the front camber doesn't get ugly.</p>
</p>
Here's my issue...</p>
</p>
It doesn't matter if you gain the additional height by way of a spacer above the strut, or heavier spring on the strut, the suspension geometry is unchanged...</p>
</p>
In the case of a spacer above the strut, the net effect is that the distance from spindle to tower is increased. In the case of a stiffer spring ,that actually effects ride height, the net effect is the same. The difference between the two merely being that the additional distance from spindle to shock tower was gained in the telescopic section of the strut, as opposed to space made above the strut.</p>
</p>
Ride height increase, per ride height increase the camber will be the same whether you use a spacer, or a different spring code... </p>
</p>
The only true solutions would be a longer A-arm, moving the shock tower connection farther inboard, moving the lower balljoint connection farther outboard or re-casting the spindle arms with less camber built in. </p>
</p>
If people aren't seeing visibly retarded camber issues with the HD springs then it's only because they don't lift the front as much as the spacers sold in the kits do.</p>